Dear, you, the user:
Firstly, hello! And how are you today? Since you ought to know that I ought to know that both of us know you cannot relay your response to this question to me (as I do not have a form for... anything — especially user feedback.) — then the ability to percieve rhetoric is an implied pre-requistite and this sentence is recursively a liar.
Do not drink gasoline. Need I say more?
My point is, there's no reason to state the obvious, especially when something is already the mantra by which you live your life.
Did Gandhi have to speak to say words? Yes. This is a terrible analogy. I don't know what it means. Writing this sentence has made me suddenly confused. Let's just move on.
Do Not Drink Gasoline
I seriously do not recommend it. Not that I've tried it. I live what I preach. I tell others not to drink gasoline, and so I also do not drink gasoline.
I'd rather not get feedback, so, let's make a deal. I'll assume you are having a good day and can comprehend english. Good human. And you can assume I'm a good writer who does not ever, not even once in a while, drink any gasoline.
And so, naturally, you'll now realize that you should read this blog.
In fact, it's occured to you that you likely had always wanted to.
Now that you have become aware of your desires,
Let's begin!
p.s. if you really need to contact me tho
Latest: Altermagnets: what the heck are they?
Altermagnets: what the heck are they?
Introduction: where do I fit into the picture?
Over the last month or so I've been working on extending Sitter to support a few different frameworks in physics which will be capable of simulating altermagnets.
My goal with that is not to choose any one direction of research. I think that the field is too new to begin choosing sides. I think it would be more useful to be able to choose all of them, in the same engine, and have the development of altermagnets be able to be tested within each one and see which ones it breaks and which ones agree and where exactly and why exactly for each of them.
I think the collective understanding of each of the frameworks and their expectations, limitations, base assumptions, and biases brought by the fields they are carried from are all useful information. I think none of them are complete, and none of them should be given priority.